International AI Safety Report 2025: First Key Update: Capabilities and Risk Implications
Authors
Yoshua Bengio, Stephen Clare, Carina Prunkl, Shalaleh Rismani, Maksym Andriushchenko, Ben Bucknall, Philip Fox, Tiancheng Hu, Cameron Jones, Sam Manning, Nestor Maslej, Vasilios Mavroudis, Conor McGlynn, Malcolm Murray, Charlotte Stix, Lucia Velasco, Nicole Wheeler, Daniel Privitera, Sören Mindermann, Daron Acemoglu, Thomas G. Dietterich, Fredrik Heintz, Geoffrey Hinton, Nick Jennings, Susan Leavy, Teresa Ludermir, Vidushi Marda, Helen Margetts, John McDermid, Jane Munga, Arvind Narayanan, Alondra Nelson, Clara Neppel, Gopal Ramchurn, Stuart Russell, Marietje Schaake, Bernhard Schölkopf, Alavaro Soto, Lee Tiedrich, Gaël Varoquaux, Andrew Yao, Ya-Qin Zhang, Leandro Aguirre, Olubunmi Ajala, Fahad Albalawi Noora AlMalek, Christian Busch, André Carvalho, Jonathan Collas, Amandeep Gill, Ahmet Hatip, Juha Heikkilä, Chris Johnson, Gill Jolly, Ziv Katzir, Mary Kerema, Hiroaki Kitano, Antonio Krüger, Aoife McLysaght, Oleksii Molchanovskyi, Andrea Monti, Kyoung Mu Lee, Mona Nemer, Nuria Oliver, Raquel Pezoa, Audrey Plonk, José Portillo, Balaraman Ravindran, Hammam Riza, Crystal Rugege, Haroon Sheikh, Denise Wong, Yi Zeng, Liming Zhu
Categories
Abstract
Since the publication of the first International AI Safety Report, AI capabilities have continued to improve across key domains. New training techniques that teach AI systems to reason step-by-step and inference-time enhancements have primarily driven these advances, rather than simply training larger models. As a result, general-purpose AI systems can solve more complex problems in a range of domains, from scientific research to software development. Their performance on benchmarks that measure performance in coding, mathematics, and answering expert-level science questions has continued to improve, though reliability challenges persist, with systems excelling on some tasks while failing completely on others. These capability improvements also have implications for multiple risks, including risks from biological weapons and cyber attacks. Finally, they pose new challenges for monitoring and controllability. This update examines how AI capabilities have improved since the first Report, then focuses on key risk areas where substantial new evidence warrants updated assessments.
International AI Safety Report 2025: First Key Update: Capabilities and Risk Implications
Categories
Abstract
Since the publication of the first International AI Safety Report, AI capabilities have continued to improve across key domains. New training techniques that teach AI systems to reason step-by-step and inference-time enhancements have primarily driven these advances, rather than simply training larger models. As a result, general-purpose AI systems can solve more complex problems in a range of domains, from scientific research to software development. Their performance on benchmarks that measure performance in coding, mathematics, and answering expert-level science questions has continued to improve, though reliability challenges persist, with systems excelling on some tasks while failing completely on others. These capability improvements also have implications for multiple risks, including risks from biological weapons and cyber attacks. Finally, they pose new challenges for monitoring and controllability. This update examines how AI capabilities have improved since the first Report, then focuses on key risk areas where substantial new evidence warrants updated assessments.
Authors
Yoshua Bengio, Stephen Clare, Carina Prunkl et al. (+70 more)
Click to preview the PDF directly in your browser